Coal production is becoming increasingly unpopular in the United States. Not a single coal plant has broken ground anywhere in the country in almost two full years. It’s truly an unprecedented achievement for those seeking to put the breaks on global warming, a victory we all ought to be celebrating as coal incineration accounts for one-third of our country’s entire CO2 emissions.
Nonetheless, while the coal industry faces resistance at home, some in the fossil fuel business are maneuvering to capitalize on the growing demand for coal in China, where coal-fired stations are being constructed at the rate of about two midsized power plants every single week.
In 2008, China topped 2.76 billion metric tons of coal output. That was over two times the production of the United States during the same time period. However, with this almost exponential surge is a silver lining of sorts — China simply cannot continue to gobble up coal at such a pace unless it becomes the world’s largest coal importer.
According to a report by the Energy Watch Group (EWG) released in 2007, the sleeping dragon does not have the recoverable reserves to keep pursuing coal energy indefinitely. EWG believes China may reach maximum production by 2015.
What exactly is China doing with all that coal? In large part the coat is burned to produce power to make steel, a product the United States does not manufacture much anymore. China is also harnessing coal power to make many of the products that Americans consume.
The International Energy Agency projects that energy needs in China will jump 75 percent by the year 2035, with coal leading the surge. If estimates are correct, and China’s reserves begin to rapidly decline over the next couple of decades while energy needs continue to increase, the country will have to get its coal stockpile from elsewhere.
Indeed the China coal import boom is already being felt.
U.S. coal exports to Asia during the first six months of 2010 increased nearly 400 percent compared to the entire year of 2009. The problem for the coal industry here in the U.S., however, is stark: coal-capable ports along the West Coast are minimal. In fact, the majority of coal exports leave North America through a single facility in Vancouver, Canada.
In a matter of a couple years China went from an exporter of coal to one of the world’s leading importers. Most of this coal has been coming from Australia, which shipped out 231 million metric tons of coal to other countries in 2006. As Ted Nace notes in his book, Climate Hope: On the Frontlines of the Fight Against Coal, “[Even] if Australia were to sell its exports exclusively to China, it would amount to less than 10 percent of China’s annual coal appetite.”
Based on the Natural Resource Council’s estimates in 2005, the total U.S. coal reserves, recoverable or not, were approximately 4,000 billion short tons. The coal-rich Powder River Basin, which straddles the Montana and Wyoming border, holds an entire total of about 800 billion short tons of coal, or 20 percent of our nation’s entire reserves. Coal from the area is highly desirable due to its low sulfur content, which often allows coal to be burned without exceeding air limits for sulfur emissions.
As such, companies in the U.S. are working fast to figure out the best way to ship Powder River Basin coal to Asia, and China in particular. It’s just a short rail journey from Wyoming to the Pacific Northwest, where a new port is being eyed to become coal ready. These companies are also working hard to open up additional mines in the region, as most of the coal available in the Powder River Basin has yet to be tapped.
The days when coal was burned close to where it was mined are coming to an end. As the market in the U.S. is squeezed due in large part to environmental problems associated with coal-firing, the industry is simultaneously expanding its business into China. All the work to end coal use in the U.S. may be diminished if China continues to expand its energy appetite.
“This is a worst-case scenario,” David Graham-Caso, spokesman for the Sierra Club, recently told the New York Times. “We don’t want this coal burned here, but we don’t want it burned at all. This is undermining everything we’ve accomplished.”
In September 2010 Peabody Energy, the world’s largest coal producer, announced to its shareholders that “coal’s best days are ahead.” Peabody stated that exports of coal from the Powder River Basin would be central to the company’s expansion goals. In particular, ports near Portland, Oregon may be used in the future to export coal to Asian countries, a company spokesperson noted.
Australia-based Ambre Energy, which has mining operations in Wyoming’s stretch of the Powder River Basin, is already pinning future profits on massive coal exports to China. Officials in Cowlitz County, Washington, which borders Oregon, recently approved a port redevelopment in the town of Longview that will allow Ambre to export five million tons of coal annually. The Longview project would be the first of several proposed new coal terminals in the region.
“I would say [the port projects are] absolutely more than a pipe dream,” said Cloud Peak Energy CEO Colin Marshall during a mining presentation in early November. Marshall’s company has interests in the Powder River Basin. “There is a lot of real action in terms of people trying to pull that together.”
It would be prescient of climate change activists to begin planning ways to halt any such port developments. Some groups already are, including the Sierra Club and Columbia Riverkeeper, an Oregon-based environmental group.
“It’s one step forward, 10 steps back if we allow coal export in our region,” said Brett VandenHeuvel, executive director of Columbia Riverkeeper.
In Australia, where exports are the norm, activists have been causing a stir at ports for years. Members of Rising Tide Australia hold an annual blockade at the largest coal port in the world located in Newcastle, which exports an average of 80 million tons of coal every year. In December 2009, approximately 25 activists from the same group chained themselves to railroad tracks and a coal train to stop idle trains from entering an coal export terminal. The standoff lasted six hours before the protesters were removed by police and charged with rail safety offenses.
Nevertheless, the quest to curb global warming is not about stopping coal exports alone. It’s simply one piece of a complex climate change puzzle. Per capita, the Chinese still emit far fewer greenhouse gases than Americans do — four versus 20 tons per person respectively. But if the United States wants to continue to lead the way in placing a moratorium on coal, we need to shut down plants and stop mining operations, as well as oppose any future coal exports in every peaceful way we possibly can.
This article was first published at Alternet.org.